The batshit insane game of win, lose or draw
Posted on: Wednesday, October 7th, 2009Let’s get one thing incredibly straight: no matter how you or I or anyone feels about the notion of deciding who gets to be mayor in the event of a tie by drawing the candidates names from a receptacle, this was the process both Ralph Wiseman and Kurtis Coombs agreed to when they entered into the race for mayor of Paradise in the first place.
That doesn’t mean this piece of municipal legislation, which is in place throughout the province under the Municipal Elections Act,
is not batshit insane and in need of review. It just means that it’s futile to complain about it being implemented in the Wiseman vs. Coombs race.
Likewise, the possibility of a judicial recount being requested was also agreed upon by both candidates before heading into the election. Good on Coombs, he pushed for one and it’s been granted. The third counting of votes for the mayor of Paradise will be held on Tuesday, October 13th.
No one seems to know what will happen if another tie is declared, but it seems logical that the result of the draw from the previous count would still stand — nothing’s changed if it’s still a tie, so why should there be another draw?
I mean, how much more batshit insane do we need things to be?
I think Greg Pike summed it up pretty nicely on his blog last Friday when he said, “Could you imagine if a hockey playoff match tie was determined by a coin flip? I suspect people would lose interest in hockey.”
Voter apathy, anyone?
The current legislation needs to be changed. Granted, drawing names from a receptacle is easier than holding another election, but who ever said democracy was supposed to come easy?











