Comments on: Police fuel cocaine and ecstasy use across province

By: Pasta im yummy

Pasta im yummy — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:25:53 +0000

haha, that picture is soooooo ef-ing FFUNNNNYYY! ..made me crack up! .,it really reminds me of someone who acted like a mouse , and pprrroooobbbllleeyyy did coke! ahah., bye!
JACOB COX ahha,. we loves ya! not reallyy

By: pasta

pasta — Sun, 19 Jul 2009 18:52:34 +0000

Weed is so not 2009s anyway.

By: darcyf

darcyf — Sun, 19 Jul 2009 18:43:23 +0000

This whole weed crackdown thing is ridiculous (not as ridiculous as pluralizing 2009, mind you, but still very ridiculous).

The amount of resources that must go into making these weed busts is no doubt considerable. Meanwhile, if you follow the VOCM online updates (they must have a police scanner manned at all times) it’s like there’s a 24/7 crime spree happening in this province.

Busting weed will not reduce crime. There’s every reason to believe it actually increases it (money lost from a drug bust has gotta get recouped somehow).

It’s time for the police to get their priorities straight.

By: Nathan

Nathan — Sun, 19 Jul 2009 18:17:04 +0000

I think the crusade against marijuana use and trafficking in the province is totally misguided. It seems to me like a bid by law enforcement to curry the favor of the province’s citizens by providing (any kind of) results and getting a “sinister” drug like pot off the streets.

I could be wrong, but I’m pretty sure pot use should be the last item on provincial law enforcement’s list of vice to be stamped out.

I can’t imagine anyone desperate enough to hold up a convenience store with a dirty syringe just to get a dimebag.

I agree with JT: As harder drugs proliferate the city, I predict a rise in violent crime.

The reality is a generous portion of people in town want to get high. If the pot is in short supply, it follows that people will look to other, more readily available (albeit more harmful) alternatives.

I’m just a layman, but it seems like the police may be taking the easy way out when it comes to tackling the influx of drugs in town. After all, pot is bulky, and gives off a certain unmistakeable aroma; on the other hand, E and coke are both more easily concealed, weigh less, and aren’t such an olfactory dead-giveaway.

It’s the 2009s: Why not put the resources into the real problem?

By: JT

JT — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:45:38 +0000

how about the “word on the street” saying that these high profile busts are only stating an amt seized of say.. 115 lbs when later the “word” is that the police actually took 400lbs. where is this dope going if it’s not being logged within the rnc/rcmp?

also another good point, crimes rates are always lower when there is dope around. everyone’s too stoned to break into a house or car. more addictive harsh drugs such as e and coke cause people to do bad things for them. weed is not sketchy.

By: Salvia

Salvia — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 08:59:49 +0000

The guys I know who are heavy into weed (they are friends and I am the sober type) have been saying for MONTHS that coke, acid, E, percocets, Demoral, and you name it could be obtained within ONE PHONE CALL yet weed is very rare.

We can obviously imagine that alcohol and E at a club would be a rush and if someone is really into drugs, that seems like a very probable route they would take.

Recently a man had significant problems with ecstasy use that caused some health problems.

They’ve had a couple weeks since that incident and they are not reporting any busts.

I think that there is something in it for them, to have such hard drugs on the street. Crime rates go up and they have something to do. Really tragic.