“Just make better movies.”

That’s an easy response to the Cannes situation, for sure. And it seems fairly logical: jury selects best films, women feel they ought to be selected, therefore women should make best films. It’s a frigging syllogism, fer chrissake.

But the thing is, we feel like the “best film” part is rigged.

If you have a look at, say, this recent study by Martha Lauzen, a professor in the School of Journalism and Media Studies at San Diego State University, you’ll see that women don’t play very big roles in the “best films.” They make up about 33% of all characters in 2011′s top-grossing North American films. And only 11% of all full-fledged leads are female characters.

We are accustomed to watching movies about men. That’s what we get, and that’s what we expect. And it starts at an early age: actress Geena Davis founded the Geena Davis Institute on Gender and Media when she noticed that all of the G-rated family films available for her kids were mostly about males. So, she commissioned a few studies, and found that, yeah, male characters in family films outnumber female characters by about three to one.

Men make films about men: the Geena Davis Institute also found that 7% of all directors, 13% of all writers, and 20% of all producers are female. (Heck, if you get even one female writer working on a film, screen time for female characters goes up by 10.4%.)

So we’re worried that, with all of that going on in the background, an unconscious requirement for “best film” is that it should be about a man, and that it’ll probably also be directed by a man.

And that, we think, sucks.

Melissa Silverstein over at Women and Hollywood just put together a great petition calling for industry-wide discussions with the leaders of festivals like Cannes about the status of women in film, and we were honoured to sign it.

Marian Evans, at Wellywood Women, wrote a great post about possible solutions to the problem of under-representation of women in film.

The Guardian just re-printed La Barbe’s letter to Cannes, translated from the original French.

Flavourwire just posted a great (but brief) history of women nominated for a Palme d’Or at Cannes.

The Toronto Sun just wrote about it. The BBC’s on the case. Cannes jury member Andrea Arnold told the Telegraph that the situation is a “great pity and a great disappointment.”

Even CTV is reporting about it.

Here’s hoping it works.

If you agree with all this, please sign the petition here.

Man, oh man, it’s heating up at Cannes.

Though the red carpet hasn’t yet been unrolled, this year’s Cannes Film Festival is already embroiled in controversy. As you may recall, there were no woman-directed films selected to compete for a Palme d’Or this year. And that has many female directors outraged.

An opinion piece that ran this week in the Le Monde, France’s main daily newspaper, calls the festival outright sexist. The article is signed by Baise Moi director Virginie Despentes, filmmaker Coline Serreau and actress Fanny Cottonçon.

“You have worked out how to prevent women from finding a place in this protected environment…,” it reads. “Above all we mustn’t let young girls get the idea that one day they could have the audacity to make a film and climb the steps to the palace on their own merit rather than on the arm of a prince charming.”

They’ve also launched a petition, called Cannes 2012: A Man is a Man, and are planning to protest at the festival wearing fake beards.

So Noreen Golfman, founder of the St. John’s International Women’s Film Festival, is on the job. She’ll be over at Cannes from May 16 to May 27 tweeting about all the action. Follow her at @ngolfman and at #SJIWFFinCannes.

Best on-site reporter ever? We sure think so.

There may not be many female-directed films at Cannes this year, but there are some fantastic female-directed films to watch on Netflix right now.

FISH TANK

Directed by Andrea Arnold, Fish Tank premièred at the 2009 Cannes Film Festival. A study in losing innocence and finding yourself, Fish Tank follows 15 year old Mia (Katie Jarvis) as her life is changed forever by the arrival of her mother’s new boyfriend (Michael Fassbender). It’s gripping and intense, and you’ll be glad you put the time in.

It’s on Netflix here.

TINY FURNITURE

Wow. Where do I even begin? First of all, the director, Lena Dunham, is 25. You may have seen or at least read about Girls, her new series on HBO.

I was excited for days after I watched this movie.

Dunham plays the lead role in the film and her character, Aura, is incredibly real. And relateable. To be honest, until I watched this movie, I don’t think I really appreciated how formulaic most young female characters are in popular films.

Though the prevailing opinion amongst savvy female film writers is that it’s horribly gauche and stereotype-enforcing to even mention this, I’m going for it: Aura isn’t really thin and abnormally beautiful. She looks like a normal human being. But unlike, say, Bridget Jones, her non-Hollywod appearance isn’t a focus for her character. There aren’t any, “Oh gosh, I’m fat” conversations; there are no, “Oh, I’d talk to him, but I’m goofy and intimidated because I’m not pretty enough” moments. Aura doesn’t get the guy, and the film doesn’t end with a swooping, gushy, piano-y, “Even girls who aren’t really thin can win!” finale.

Because that’s not what the film is about. THAT’S NOT WHAT MATTERS IN THIS MOVIE. I repeat: THAT’S NOT WHAT MATTERS. In a movie. About young women.

I could have cried with gratitude and relief. Hell, I still might.

This movie is about a young woman who just finished college and has no bloody clue what to do with herself. She’s from a wealthy background, her mother is a mostly detached artist, and she really could do whatever she wanted. If only she could figure out what that was. Or how to do it.

It’s about how, in your mid-twenties, when you’re sorting yourself out as a woman, sometimes no amount of wealth, or cool artist upbringings, or hip lofts, or educated banter can protect you from that dodgy, Cormac McCarthy-reading sous chef who still lives with the girlfriend he’s cheating on. You’ll still sleep with him. And you’ll still be left wondering who you are and why you did that, and what the hell it says about you and the world you’re trying to navigate.

God, I love this movie.

Here’s the Netflix link.

IN A BETTER WORLD

This one brought on tears of a different sort. It’s about two families who are brought together by their sons. One son is bullied at school, and the other, after losing his mother to cancer, is using his unbearable anger to stop the bullying. Directed by Suzanne Bier, it won Best Foreign Language Film at the 2011 Oscars.

I think the film is about the violence, both emotional and physical, we inflict on each other and how it manifests. I spent most of the film sobbing, whispering, “It’s okay! It’s okay!” at most of the characters. But I’m glad I endured the emotional trauma. The story-telling in this movie is incredible. Tough times pile onto the characters, and each situation handicaps how the character copes with the next, but the shit storms hit in exactly the way they hit in real life. So instead of feeling manipulated, I felt humbled and impressed by this film’s exceptional writing.

It’s on Netflix here.

Have recommendations of your own? Post them in the comments below, or fire ‘em off to sarah@womensfilmfestival.com.

There are no female directors vying for a Palme d’Or at Cannes this year.

There were three women on the nine-person jury — German actress Diane Kruger, British actress and director Andrea Arnold, and French actress Emmanuelle Devos –but of the 22 films selected for the main competition, none were directed by a woman.

Jane Campion has been the only female director to ever win a Palme d’Or at Cannes, for her 1993 film, The Piano. In 2009, which saw three female-directed films in the Cannes main competition, she spoke about the lack of female directors, both in the industry and at Cannes. In 2010, when no female directed-films were selected for the main competition (number of women on the jury: 2), British director Ruth Torjussen organized a petition and called for selection panels to consist of 50 percent women.

In 2011, with four women on the jury, four films in the main competition were directed by women.

In 2012, that number is back down to zero.

We rounded up a few filmmakers to ask them how they felt about this. Below are responses from Jordan Canning, Ingrid Veninger, Justin Simms and Darcy Fitzpatrick.

INGRID VENINGER
“Yesterday, I participated in a Women’s Filmmakers Symposium at the Sarasota Film Festival. Debra Zimmerman, Executive Director of Women Make Movies, kicked us off with the facts we know too well… Women hold positions as producers far more than they do as directors, agencies representing filmmakers are dominated by men, the most powerful film festivals are run by men… and it’s getting worse because the percentage of female directors is going down and the percentage of leading roles for women is going down.

We have to keep making good movies and lots of them, and we will always have to work ten times harder than men, because there are fewer of us at film festivals and in the marketplace. The man beside me just said, “Maybe there were just no good films by women submitted to Cannes this year!” Personally, I would like to know how many films directed by women were submitted to Cannes, in relation to how many films directed by men. Could it be 100:1? Regardless, the issue is complex and it seems to be getting worse because the percentage of female directors is going down, not up. We are a minority in the motion picture industry and whoever thinks it’s only about talent is naive.”

JUSTIN SIMMS
“I was just up at the Writer’s Guild of Canada National Forum and one of the stats that came out of there was that only 32% of the Writers Guild of Canada are female, which I thought was interesting in light of the Cannes situation.

The thing to keep in mind about the Cannes thing, and I’m not excusing it at all, is that the competition selections are highly political insofar as they are highly sought-after and, at Cannes, they really try and put famous filmmakers in there. And, quite frankly, there are just more well-known male filmmakers than female filmmakers.

A common thing that we all see is that there aren’t a lot of great acting parts for women and I think that is because there aren’t enough female writers. Writers will write what they know. So that’s why so many movies are about white guys, because most of the writers are white guys. So the key for getting better acting roles for women is getting more women writing scripts.

And I think that relates to the Cannes situation in that it’s a numbers issue. Even in a civilized and forward country like Canada, 3/4 of the screenwriters are male.

So how do you fix it? Do you put in a quota system? Would filmmakers actually want that? Is it a solvable problem? I don’t know. To a certain extent, I think it’s just the way it is, essentially. But that doesn’t mean that we should pay no attention to it. I think it calls out to us to pay more attention to women filmmakers and women screenwriters, and we’re all responsible for that.”

JORDAN CANNING
“It’s a disappointment, to say the least. Last year’s Cannes lineup had a number of incredible films by women – the utterly singular and stellar Lynne Ramsay, for example – and I find it hard to believe that there was NO work by female filmmakers submitted this year worth including in the competition?! It’s a tricky question – should Cannes have a mandate to program a certain number of films by women? Certainly, in some bizarro extreme hypothetical world when there are literally ZERO films submitted by women (or truly no good ones), then I don’t think a film should be included just because it was directed by a woman. But I do think that festivals like Cannes (and TIFF, Tribeca, Sundance, etc.) are in the unique position of being the first stop for seeing every great new film out there. They have the power to support those films, get them out to the general public, help them find audiences they wouldn’t normally reach. That’s a huge privilege – and a great responsibility – and it’s frustrating that the work of female filmmakers is so often overshadowed or, in this case, completely overlooked.”

DARCY FITZPATRICK
“When I learned that Cannes had managed to overlook women directors completely for Competition in this year’s festival, I decided to take a close look at just what kind of festival Cannes claims itself to be.

Their website is littered with bold statements of noble intent, each of which makes the total lack of female directed films In Competition this year all the more difficult to understand.

You know that thing you do after eating Chinese Food when you read out the fortune from your fortune cookie and you end it with “in bed” and it’s always hilarious? I found myself ending the statements on the Cannes website with a singular statement of my own, but it was never so much funny as confusing.

From Thierry Frémaux, Festival Director:
‘Cannes belongs to each and every one of us who, year after year, from wherever we are and in our own individual way, contributes towards creating it step by step. It is only by constantly analyzing the Festival, adapting its function and encouraging debate about it that we will continue to make it the very best it can be. Cannes must be open to new ideas, while remaining faithful to its past, of course. Diversity can only enrich it. That´s what makes the Festival de Cannes our festival.’

And yet we couldn’t find a single female directed film this year worthy of Competition.

See what I mean? It just doesn’t make any sense. Let’s try it with a few more.

Article 1 from the Official Selection Rules states: ‘The spirit of the Festival de Cannes is one of friendship and universal cooperation. Its aim is to reveal and focus attention on works of quality in order to contribute to the evolution of motion picture arts and to encourage development of the film industry throughout the world.’

And yet we couldn’t find a single female directed film this year worthy of Competition.

Weird, right? How about a couple of items from their FAQ:

‘What is the mission of the Festival de Cannes?
Ever since its creation, the Festival de Cannes has remained faithful to its founding purpose: to draw attention to and raise the profile of films with the aim of contributing towards the development of cinema, boosting the film industry worldwide and celebrating cinema at an international level.’

And yet we couldn’t find a single female directed film this year worthy of Competition.

‘What initiatives has the Festival set up to encourage film production?
The Festival is very keen to discover new talent and act as a springboard for creation. The development of “Cannes Short Film” is just one example of this. A number of initiatives aimed at supporting the talent of the future have already been introduced: the Caméra d’Or is awarded to the best film presented either in the Official Selection, during Directors´ Fortnight or during the Semaine de la Critique.
The Cinéfondation, which serves to showcase new trends in the film industry, screens films from film schools as part of the Official Selection, as well as organising [sic] the Résidence and the Atelier.’

And yet we couldn’t find a single female directed film this year worthy of Competition.

Errr…? Finally, let’s dig into the Festival Press Kit to see what kind of message Cannes is sending out to the media:

‘For what hasn’t and won’t change is the kind of filmmaker that makes Cannes, and not the ephemeral or the froth. In a world that sacrifices everything to what’s superficial, to the new-best-thing, to the lowest common denominator, to the non-debate of ideas through apathy, what counts, what makes us strong, is our passion for cinema and for those who make it: the great auteur filmmakers.
The greatness of Cannes is its ability to bring together and share that very special moment when a film is discovered. A film which, in the blink of an eye, invents, awakens, overwhelms, deifies.’

And yet we couldn’t find a single female directed film this year worthy of Competition.

Is anyone else as confused as I am?

There are 22 films being screened In Competition this year at Cannes. From all that I’ve read on how the festival views and conducts itself, there’s nothing that should preclude the inclusion of a female director in that list. And yet this year there are none.

For everything Cannes has had to say about itself, it seems they still have some explaining to do. Because if you can’t find even one female directed film from around the world to join a list of 22 that you deem worthy of Competition, your intentions might just be in need of reevaluation.”

What do you think? Post your comments below or send them to sarah@womensfilmfestival.com.

Writer and director Elsa Morena just finished shooting her latest short film, Winners, which she – appropriately – wrote and directed. She made the film through NIFCO’s Picture Start program, which guides selected writer-director-producer teams through the filmmaking process and gives emerging filmmakers and producers a leg up on their careers.

I caught up with her to talk about Winners, monster dating, and uppity Vancouver fertilizer.

You had a short film in the Women’s Film Festival last year.
Yep, it was in the Women’s and the Nickel, it was called Watching Emily.

Was that your first film?
It was the first I did that had a story. I’ve done music videos, and things to put up on YouTube, but this was my first script that I wrote and directed myself.

What music videos did you make?
I made one for the Idlers.

What did you do for YouTube?
I did this sort of comedy sketch with my writing partner, Amy Doherty. We did a parody of that 80s dating video montage and instead of awful, weird, quirky people, there were monsters. It’s called Monster Date and it’s about monsters trying to get a date. We did it while we were at the Vancouver Film School and they loved it so much that they put their name on it and used it a promotional video like, ‘Look at what our students can do!’

Was there a monster in the video that you would have dated?
Probably the elf. He’s weird and interesting.

So, Winners. You guys shot that over St. Patrick’s Day?
We did. It was really risky because we didn’t know whether it would be summer or winter.

You had that crazy ice rain storm, too.
Yeah, we had that mini ice storm on the first day! Everyone was all, ‘I don’t think we can do this,’ but then we all remembered that everyone on the crew has shot in worse weather than that.

What is Winners about?
It’s about two best friends that are really competitive and they find out that they have to… well, you know at school, when you sell chocolate to raise money for the school? Well they’re selling fertilizer. And they find out that the principal is conning them and they have wind up having to figure out whether they want to keep selling and keep competing with each other, or just stop and save the friendship. It’s a battle between winning the prize or saving your friendship. And in the end, there’s a big old fertilizer fight.

Why did you pick fertilizer as the thing they’re selling?
Because I thought it was the most ridiculous thing to sell, especially in a city. Ironically, when I gave the script to my friends to edit, it was when I was in school in Vancouver, and some of them said, ‘We had to sell to fertilzer!’ But of course, I was in Vancouver and everybody’s into that, pro-green was the way of life out there.

Sorry to get off track here, but when did you graduate from the Vancouver Film School?
A year and a half ago.

So, overall, how was the Winners shoot?
The biggest challenge with Winners was that we had children in our film, so we could only have eight-hour shooting days. So every minute was precious. Because of that, it really made me have to prepare a lot in advance. I prep all the time anyway, I’m organized in that way, but you have to prepare yourself to be able to cut your shoot list and be able to just let some things go.

We were lucky, too, because our crew was a mix of poeple who have been in the industry for a while and new people. We had a really young crew and we were able to give responsibilities to people who had never been in that position before. But that meant that they were extra passionate and really driven to prove themselves and make it work on a really tight schedule.

How old were the kids you were wrangling?
They were between 9 and 14. Percy White plays Max, and he is just an amazingly talented little kid. His mother is Sherry White and his father is Joel Hynes so the talent is in the blood, but I was so impressed with him. He was jumping off the walls but the minute the camera started rolling he was so focused, it was amazing to see such talent.

You’re also a writer at Best Boy Entertainment, right?
I’m a writer for two of their shows: Mickey’s Farm and a docu-drama series called Pet ER. I’ve been working there for a little over a year.

So you’re living the dream, employed in the industry to you want to work in.
I’m doing the job that I always wanted to do, yeah. I’m 27 years old and I can say that I have a career job right now. I’m glad that I moved back to St. John’s. I don’t think that I would have been able to get so far ahead so quickly in the industry if I hadn’t have come back here. And I personally think that in St. John’s, women in the film industry are well respected. It feels a lot different here than from Montreal and Vancouver where I lived before, where it’s still kind of a novelty for women to be in the industry. But because of the Women’s Film Festival here, back in the day if you wanted a film to get into a festival, that was the only festival. So you had to get a woman on board and that meant that women were part of the creative process. And I really think that because of that, it’s easier over here for a woman to break into the industry.

I started here as a boom microphone operator. I went to NIFCO and I banged on the door and said, ‘I wanna learn sound.’ It was something that I just never knew anything about in film, and I wanted to know everything about the industry. So I did that, and I worked my way up. When I moved to Vancouver, I started getting gigs as a boom op and I had so many people out there saying, ‘Oh my God, a female boom op?! A woman in sound?!’ But over here, it’s nothing. Over here, there are lots of women in different parts of the film industry.

If you could go back and tell your younger self anything, or give yourself some advice, what would you say?
I’d probably go back and say, ‘You don’t have to drink that much, I mean really.’ [laughs] But no, I have to say, I’m in a pretty good position right now and I think I’m really lucky to be where I am right now. I know a lot of talented people out there that are still struggling to break in, but I’m really lucky to be in this position and I recognize that, so I try to give back. I’ve had a lot of people who have mentored me throughout my career, so I try to mentor people as well. I volunteer and I ask people to give me their scripts and I’ll give them notes — anything I can do to pay back the community.

What sorts of mentoring things to do you?
I did the 24 hour film challenge for high school students with the Women’s Film Fest and I also toured with the Nickel to schools in the province and did some workshops on how to make a film with high school students.

I wish back when I was in high schol that there was someone like me that came in and talked to me! I had no idea about the film world except for what I saw in the movies. You don’t learn about it in school, it’s something you find out later in life when you’re in college or university, so I’m really glad that I ended up doing those workshops.

Maybe you’ll wind up mentoring them through Picture Start! How did you find your Picture Start experience?
You submit a script with a director and producer team, and then they choose the teams. My producer was Patrick Condon (pictured left), we’ve worked together on a lot of things, so they chose us. Then you’re given a budget and you have mentors that guide you through the process. You have to at least have done the First Time Filmmakers program which I had done to make Watching Emily the year before. But yeah, they really are great at mentoring you through the process, and you get access to a lot of people who have been in the industry before, and I think that was actually the most helpful part of it: having someone sit you down and tell you the realities of the film world.

Is there anything else that you’d like to add?
I am actually the only female that got chosen in the Picture Start program this year. Last year, there were three woman but they were all producers. This year I‘m the only one, and it’s a creative position, as writer/director.

Not bad!
Not bad at all!

Pictures from the Winners shoot were taken by Susan Morrissey Wyse. Elsa’s headshot taken by Herb Gibbons III.

Welcome to the second episode of Signal’s (still-new) streaming audio show, Static, featuring Melanie Caines and Krystle Hayden. They joined me to discuss their ongoing music and yoga collaboration, DJ Detox at Nova Yoga.

Thanks to Melanie and Krystle for their time, and thanks as well to Krystle for selecting and arranging the music for this episode – a taste of what’s to come at the DJ Detox yoga class at Nova Yoga Thursday, April 26th at 6pm!

First off, a caveat: I don’t really drink that much beer. Err, I mean, I’m certainly not an expert on brewing or tasting beer and wouldn’t want to upset any of our beautiful beer experts out there. So, to put it out front and in the open – no, I did not go to Beer University nor did I taste the beer and spit it out into a bucket (like you see on TV and in the movies).

I totally drank it.

So, armed with a dozen of Quidi Vidi’s latest seasonal, the British India Pale Ale, otherwise known as IPA, and joined by a group of friends, my mission was clear. But before the drinking could begin, I decided to check out Quidi Vidi Brewery’s website to see what I had gotten myself into. There I learned that the QV IPA took Gold at Chicago’s World Beer Championships, and that Tastings.com describes it like this:

“Beautiful deep amber color. Savory grainy bread, dusty root vegetable, and Swiss chard aromas and flavors with a crisp, frothy medium body and a nicely astringent, honeyed citrus and minerally, leafy hop finish. A very nice food beer that really nails the British IPA hop profile. 90 Points [Exceptional].”

Whoa, that’s a pretty great review. But, how does it taste out here in the real world? I decided to put the IPA to the test, literally taste testing on the move!

First up – the standard Road Pop. The what, you ask? A walking Road Pop is the beer that an enthusiastic and free spirited young lad or lass would grab to drink for the five minute walk from the house party to the bar show. The Road Pop is a bit risqué considering that drinking in public is a no-no around these parts, but maybe that’s what makes the Road Pop so darn delicious. We hit the streets, walking a staggering pace and I cracked the first beer… ssst. Nice and cold, compliments of my oddly small Kenmore fridge. The beer was quite smooth, and a little creamy… and has that really cool “tastes like pennies” after taste, which gives it a “HELLL-O” kick.

Was it the wind blowing in my new boy-band coif, the salt water in the air of downtown St. John’s? Or, was this beer really showing me the love? I passed it around to my companions, and they agreed… good and tasty.

The following day, a Sunday, we hit the woods. Half dazed, our small crew headed out along the trail near Topsail Beach with the Quidi Vidi IPA packed away nice and safe. We climbed small sets of beaten up stairs, threw ourselves over boulders, got completely weirded out by the creepy shaped trees and numerous “fairy” holes dotting the trail before descending down to the beach to make a fire. A brilliant idea popped up – chill our beers in the icy cold Atlantic water before swinging er’ back! Perfect.

It was a beautiful spring and SUNNY day, a light breeze was blowing if any. We watched the waves crash in and out on our brown bottles secured to the rocks, licking our lips with anticipation. Finally, when sufficient time had passed, “Let’s go” I said. Ssst, ssst… ssst. Chug, chug, chug… it was the most delicious thing we had ever tasted! Refreshing, woodsy and edgy. A perfect addition to our trip… someone yelled, “this ain’t no amateur’s beer – it’s got a bold bite to it!”

Satisfied, we kicked sand (ok, rocks) over our fire and began to walk northwest back along the beach.

For our final destination, we decided to do the tourist thing and drive the 20-odd kilometres out to Cape Spear. With our designated driver behind the wheel, we hit the road.

When we reached our destination we climbed to the crest of the hill, where the lighthouse sits ever so comfortably on top its sea beaten boulders. There we sat, side by side, looking out over the vast ocean, amazed for a moment by the sight of massive white ice chunks just across the way – floating just outside of the Quidi Vidi Gut.

We listened to the waves and seagulls play their spectacular ocean symphony as it carried over the air. I couldn’t think of a better time to pass out the IPAs… although a little warm with backpack heat, the first gulp went down smooth, clean and delicious. And, who could forget that biting hoppy taste?! It might just be a little bit of Newfoundland in a bottle.

After a few groovy adventures, and twelve empties neatly stacked back into their box – the mission had been accomplished. Quidi Vidi Brewery’s new IPA has proven to impress on the street, on the beach and sitting on a rock at the edge of the world.

I’ll admit, as an infrequent and light beer drinker, it did take several initial sips for me to get adjusted to the bitterness of an IPA. But, after that, I grew to appreciate the strong taste of pine and distinctive earthy aroma that is consistent with each bottle. In short, no matter where we went the IPA tasted great and if anything, reminded us how great it was to enjoy a homemade brew outdoors in the fresh air. Thanks Quidi Vidi, and a job well done!

The forum about the St. John’s multi-purpose arts centre on Thursday was packed! If you missed it, The Scope live-tweeted the proceedings. And if you’d still like to submit your two cents, Taryn Sheppard, an architect with Sheppard Case Architects, the company hired to oversee the demand assessment for the centre, says you haven’t missed your chance.

“People can send email to info@sheppardcase.nf.ca,” she says. “It would be great if they could provide a bit of info about themselves and their role in the arts community just so we can be sure that the feedback is coming from the stakeholder group (i.e. the arts community).”

Remember, this is just an assessment about the existing demand for such a space.

The Lawnya Vawnya festival is back for a second year, and this time they brought the Inbreds. And Cadence Weapon.

But they also have this wicked little thing called a Music Crawl, wherein a gang of music fans prowl through the sunny, glorious streets of St. John’s to undisclosed locations at which musicians are waiting to greet them with a mini concert. A klezmer band may or may not lead the procession.

Point is, it’s fan-bloody-tastic, and if you missed today’s Music Crawl, there’s another one tomorrow, April the 22nd, that meets at Model Citizens at noon. And you can even bring your kids. If you got ‘em. Otherwise, well, maybe some thick-rimmed glasses and a good-looking hat.

Here’s the Music Crawl line-up for Sunday. And here are some pictures from today’s music crawl.

Outside the Laura Barret show at Afterwords

Beautiousness at Ebb and Flow provided by Richard Laviolette and a very appreciative crowd:

Mo’ Wax: Wax Mannequin at Rocket

Four days in, and Lawnya Vawnya organizer Ariel Sharratt is still sane.

Heading out to see a movie in St. John’s this week? Here’s how the films at Empire Theatres, Studio 12, at Avalon Mall fare with the Bechdel Test. To pass the Bechdel Test a film must a) have two named female characters who b) talk to each other about c) something other than a man. Easy, right? Not so much. Have a look at the list of films that pass on the Bechdel website. It’s a little depressing.

Cabin in the Woods – A bunch of friends get tricked into spending a few nights at a cabin and that somehow results in the world ending? Or something? It passes, though barely. According to the Bechdel site, there’s just one conversation between two female characters that gets the film a pass, and it’s embedded within a larger conversation about boyfriends.

(As an interesting side note, a lot of horror films actually do pass the Bechdel test. They do it while their female characters get blood spattered across tight white tank tops, but they do it. More on that later.)

Hunger Games – Set in the future, when children fight to the death on live television. The star is a young girl, who takes her sister’s place in one of the fights. Huge pass. Apparently even the towns in the film are very egalitarian, gender-wise. Even though they watch children fighting on TV.

American Reunion – It’s the American Pie people! Ten years later! At their reunion. Yeah. Though the official Bechdel site doesn’t have a listing for this one, Sarina Murray, over at Lip Magazine, gives it a fail.

Mirror Mirror – It’s the story of Snow White, redone. And it’s a pass! But a dubious one. According to the Bechdel page, only Snow White has a name; the Queen is “the Queen,” and the Baker’s Woman is “the Baker’s Woman.” All the male characters, on the other hand, get names.

21 Jump Street – Two cops get sent back to their old high school to bust some drug dealers. + hijinks. No official rating on the Bechdel site, but this guy says it fails. If you go see it, let us know.

Titanic 3D – You know the story. And, yes, it passes, and it passes well.

Dr. Seuss’ The Lorax - It’s The Lorax! Well, actually it’s The Lorax embedded into a story about a little boy trying to win the heart of a little girl. According to some blogs, it passes, to others, it doesn’t. You’ll have to see it and decide for yourself. And then let us know.

Wrath of the Titans – Perseus and Zeus and Ares and Hades and Titans and no named women who have a decent conversation. Fail.